Willis Lamm's
|
History of Traffic Signal Design |
More Advances in Signal Design and Placement |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Other concerns were raised about a single signal head controlling multiple lanes of traffic. Some jurisdictions had six lane roads (three lanes in each direction) that were controlled by a single signal head. Even at smaller intersections there were concerns about the risks involved if a red bulb burned out.
Single signals once controlled multiple lanes of traffic.
|
On wider streets both of these problems were solved by installing at least two signal heads facing each direction. In 1949 Crouse-Hinds promoted the idea of double red lights for narrower streets (having only one lane in each direction) where a single signal head was adequate visibly but where a redundant red light should be provided to maintain protection in the event of a bulb failure. |
![]() |
![]() |
A standard was also established that on streets with speed limits higher than 40 MPH, red lenses should be 12 inches in diameter rather than the traditional 8-3/8 inches. The 12 inch lens could project a larger, brighter and more distinctive light, allowing drivers of vehicles traveling at faster speeds to recognize that the light was red from a longer distance away, ensuring safer stopping distances. Many single faced signals installed on boulevards were equipped with 12 inch red sections. Manufacturers designed adapters that could be installed on preexisting signals that did not have 12 inch red sections. |
![]() |
![]() |
The standards for indications that displayed arrows also increased to 12 inches since the arrow masks emitted less light and could be less distinguishable during bad weather conditions. Eventually many jurisdictions simply installed signals with all 12 inch lenses regardless as to their placement, posted road speeds, etc. |
![]() |
![]() |